feat: classy dark one-pager with modal, webhook, shiny gold, sticky nav
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
|
||||
# AI Writing Detection
|
||||
|
||||
Words, phrases, and punctuation patterns commonly associated with AI-generated text. Avoid these to ensure writing sounds natural and human.
|
||||
|
||||
Sources: Grammarly (2025), Microsoft 365 Life Hacks (2025), GPTHuman (2025), Walter Writes (2025), Textero (2025), Plagiarism Today (2025), Rolling Stone (2025), MDPI Blog (2025)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Contents
|
||||
- Em Dashes: The Primary AI Tell
|
||||
- Overused Verbs
|
||||
- Overused Adjectives
|
||||
- Overused Transitions and Connectors
|
||||
- Phrases That Signal AI Writing (Opening Phrases, Transitional Phrases, Concluding Phrases, Structural Patterns)
|
||||
- Filler Words and Empty Intensifiers
|
||||
- Academic-Specific AI Tells
|
||||
- How to Self-Check
|
||||
|
||||
## Em Dashes: The Primary AI Tell
|
||||
|
||||
**The em dash (—) has become one of the most reliable markers of AI-generated content.**
|
||||
|
||||
Em dashes are longer than hyphens (-) and are used for emphasis, interruptions, or parenthetical information. While they have legitimate uses in writing, AI models drastically overuse them.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Em Dashes Signal AI Writing
|
||||
- AI models were trained on edited books, academic papers, and style guides where em dashes appear frequently
|
||||
- AI uses em dashes as a shortcut for sentence variety instead of commas, colons, or parentheses
|
||||
- Most human writers rarely use em dashes because they don't exist as a standard keyboard key
|
||||
- The overuse is so consistent that it has become the unofficial signature of ChatGPT writing
|
||||
|
||||
### What To Do Instead
|
||||
| Instead of | Use |
|
||||
|------------|-----|
|
||||
| The results—which were surprising—showed... | The results, which were surprising, showed... |
|
||||
| This approach—unlike traditional methods—allows... | This approach, unlike traditional methods, allows... |
|
||||
| The study found—as expected—that... | The study found, as expected, that... |
|
||||
| Communication skills—both written and verbal—are essential | Communication skills (both written and verbal) are essential |
|
||||
|
||||
### Guidelines
|
||||
- Use commas for most parenthetical information
|
||||
- Use colons to introduce explanations or lists
|
||||
- Use parentheses for supplementary information
|
||||
- Reserve em dashes for rare, deliberate emphasis only
|
||||
- If you find yourself using more than one em dash per page, revise
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overused Verbs
|
||||
|
||||
| Avoid | Use Instead |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| delve (into) | explore, examine, investigate, look at |
|
||||
| leverage | use, apply, draw on |
|
||||
| optimise | improve, refine, enhance |
|
||||
| utilise | use |
|
||||
| facilitate | help, enable, support |
|
||||
| foster | encourage, support, develop, nurture |
|
||||
| bolster | strengthen, support, reinforce |
|
||||
| underscore | emphasise, highlight, stress |
|
||||
| unveil | reveal, show, introduce, present |
|
||||
| navigate | manage, handle, work through |
|
||||
| streamline | simplify, make more efficient |
|
||||
| enhance | improve, strengthen |
|
||||
| endeavour | try, attempt, effort |
|
||||
| ascertain | find out, determine, establish |
|
||||
| elucidate | explain, clarify, make clear |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overused Adjectives
|
||||
|
||||
| Avoid | Use Instead |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| robust | strong, reliable, thorough, solid |
|
||||
| comprehensive | complete, thorough, full, detailed |
|
||||
| pivotal | key, critical, central, important |
|
||||
| crucial | important, key, essential, critical |
|
||||
| vital | important, essential, necessary |
|
||||
| transformative | significant, important, major |
|
||||
| cutting-edge | new, advanced, recent, modern |
|
||||
| groundbreaking | new, original, significant |
|
||||
| innovative | new, original, creative |
|
||||
| seamless | smooth, easy, effortless |
|
||||
| intricate | complex, detailed, complicated |
|
||||
| nuanced | subtle, complex, detailed |
|
||||
| multifaceted | complex, varied, diverse |
|
||||
| holistic | complete, whole, comprehensive |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overused Transitions and Connectors
|
||||
|
||||
| Avoid | Use Instead |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| furthermore | also, in addition, and |
|
||||
| moreover | also, and, besides |
|
||||
| notwithstanding | despite, even so, still |
|
||||
| that being said | however, but, still |
|
||||
| at its core | essentially, fundamentally, basically |
|
||||
| to put it simply | in short, simply put |
|
||||
| it is worth noting that | note that, importantly |
|
||||
| in the realm of | in, within, regarding |
|
||||
| in the landscape of | in, within |
|
||||
| in today's [anything] | currently, now, today |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phrases That Signal AI Writing
|
||||
|
||||
### Opening Phrases to Avoid
|
||||
- "In today's fast-paced world..."
|
||||
- "In today's digital age..."
|
||||
- "In an era of..."
|
||||
- "In the ever-evolving landscape of..."
|
||||
- "In the realm of..."
|
||||
- "It's important to note that..."
|
||||
- "Let's delve into..."
|
||||
- "Imagine a world where..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Transitional Phrases to Avoid
|
||||
- "That being said..."
|
||||
- "With that in mind..."
|
||||
- "It's worth mentioning that..."
|
||||
- "At its core..."
|
||||
- "To put it simply..."
|
||||
- "In essence..."
|
||||
- "This begs the question..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Concluding Phrases to Avoid
|
||||
- "In conclusion..."
|
||||
- "To sum up..."
|
||||
- "By [doing X], you can [achieve Y]..."
|
||||
- "In the final analysis..."
|
||||
- "All things considered..."
|
||||
- "At the end of the day..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Structural Patterns to Avoid
|
||||
- "Whether you're a [X], [Y], or [Z]..." (listing three examples after "whether")
|
||||
- "It's not just [X], it's also [Y]..."
|
||||
- "Think of [X] as [elaborate metaphor]..."
|
||||
- Starting sentences with "By" followed by a gerund: "By understanding X, you can Y..."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Filler Words and Empty Intensifiers
|
||||
|
||||
These words often add nothing to meaning. Remove them or find specific alternatives:
|
||||
|
||||
- absolutely
|
||||
- actually
|
||||
- basically
|
||||
- certainly
|
||||
- clearly
|
||||
- definitely
|
||||
- essentially
|
||||
- extremely
|
||||
- fundamentally
|
||||
- incredibly
|
||||
- interestingly
|
||||
- naturally
|
||||
- obviously
|
||||
- quite
|
||||
- really
|
||||
- significantly
|
||||
- simply
|
||||
- surely
|
||||
- truly
|
||||
- ultimately
|
||||
- undoubtedly
|
||||
- very
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Academic-Specific AI Tells
|
||||
|
||||
| Avoid | Use Instead |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| shed light on | clarify, explain, reveal |
|
||||
| pave the way for | enable, allow, make possible |
|
||||
| a myriad of | many, numerous, various |
|
||||
| a plethora of | many, numerous, several |
|
||||
| paramount | very important, essential, critical |
|
||||
| pertaining to | about, regarding, concerning |
|
||||
| prior to | before |
|
||||
| subsequent to | after |
|
||||
| in light of | because of, given, considering |
|
||||
| with respect to | about, regarding, for |
|
||||
| in terms of | regarding, for, about |
|
||||
| the fact that | that (or rewrite sentence) |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Self-Check
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read your text aloud. If phrases sound unnatural in speech, revise them
|
||||
2. Ask: "Would I say this in a conversation with a colleague?"
|
||||
3. Check for repetitive sentence structures
|
||||
4. Look for clusters of the words listed above
|
||||
5. Ensure varied sentence lengths (not all similar length)
|
||||
6. Verify each intensifier adds genuine meaning
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
|
||||
# International SEO: Evidence & Sources
|
||||
|
||||
Detailed evidence backing the International SEO & Localization section of the SEO Audit skill. Organized by topic with source URLs and key quotes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Hreflang
|
||||
|
||||
### Placement Methods
|
||||
|
||||
Google supports three equivalent methods: HTML `<link>` in `<head>`, HTTP `Link` headers, and XML sitemap `<xhtml:link>` elements. Google confirmed no method is prioritized over another.
|
||||
|
||||
Google combines signals from both HTML and sitemaps. If the same language-region pair points to different URLs across methods, Google drops that pair rather than guessing.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Search Central: Localized Versions](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions)
|
||||
- [SEJ: Google Combines Hreflang Signals](https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-combines-hreflang-signals-from-html-sitemaps/389219/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Reciprocal Requirement
|
||||
|
||||
Google's docs: "If page X links to page Y, page Y must link back to page X. If not, those annotations may be ignored or not interpreted correctly."
|
||||
|
||||
Every page must include itself (self-referencing) in the hreflang set. Missing self-referencing is the #1 error found by Semrush audits. A study of 374,756 domains found 67% of hreflang implementations had issues.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Search Central: Localized Versions](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions)
|
||||
- [Semrush: 9 Common Hreflang Errors](https://www.semrush.com/blog/hreflang-errors/)
|
||||
- [SE Land: 31% of International Websites Contain Hreflang Errors](https://searchengineland.com/study-31-of-international-websites-contain-hreflang-errors-395161)
|
||||
|
||||
### x-default
|
||||
|
||||
Introduced April 2013. Designates the fallback page for users whose language/region matches no declared variant. Can point to the same URL as one of the language-specific alternates. Must be included in the complete set of annotations on every variant page.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Blog: x-default hreflang](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2013/04/x-default-hreflang-for-international-pages)
|
||||
- [Google Blog: How x-default can help you (2023)](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/05/x-default)
|
||||
|
||||
### Language & Region Codes
|
||||
|
||||
Language: ISO 639-1 (2-letter). Region: ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 (2-letter). Format: `language[-script][-region]`.
|
||||
|
||||
You cannot specify a region code alone. Common mistakes: `en-UK` (should be `en-GB`), `es-419` (not ISO 3166-1). A study found 8.9% of sites using hreflang contain invalid language codes.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Search Central: Localized Versions](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions)
|
||||
- [SE Land: 31% Study](https://searchengineland.com/study-31-of-international-websites-contain-hreflang-errors-395161)
|
||||
|
||||
### Hreflang at Scale (20+ locales)
|
||||
|
||||
With 20 locales, HTML `<head>` hreflang adds ~1.5KB per page for zero user benefit. Sitemap-based hreflang has zero runtime performance impact. `<xhtml:link>` child elements do NOT count toward the 50,000 URL sitemap limit (only `<loc>` elements count).
|
||||
|
||||
John Mueller recommends focusing hreflang on pages receiving wrong-language traffic, not every page: "I wouldn't do it for any of the other pages of the site because it's so complex & hard to manage."
|
||||
|
||||
- [SERoundtable: Child Elements Don't Count](https://www.seroundtable.com/google-child-elements-dont-count-towards-sitemap-url-limit-34377.html)
|
||||
- [SERoundtable: Where To Focus Hreflang](https://www.seroundtable.com/using-hreflang-34127.html)
|
||||
- [Yoast: hreflang Ultimate Guide](https://yoast.com/hreflang-ultimate-guide/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Google vs Bing
|
||||
|
||||
Bing treats hreflang as a "weak signal." Bing relies on `content-language` meta tag, HTML `lang` attribute, ccTLDs, and server location. Yandex supports hreflang like Google.
|
||||
|
||||
For both engines: implement hreflang (Google/Yandex) + `<html lang="...">` + `<meta http-equiv="content-language">` (Bing).
|
||||
|
||||
- [Digital Ready Marketing: Bing Doesn't Use Hreflang](https://digitalreadymarketing.com/bing-doesnt-use-hreflang-annotation-what-does-it-use/)
|
||||
- [Yoast: hreflang Ultimate Guide](https://yoast.com/hreflang-ultimate-guide/)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Canonicalization & i18n
|
||||
|
||||
### Self-Referencing Canonicals
|
||||
|
||||
Each locale page must canonical to itself. John Mueller: "Don't use a rel=canonical across languages/countries, only use it on a per-country/language basis."
|
||||
|
||||
Google's docs: "Specify a canonical page in the same language, or the best possible substitute language if a canonical doesn't exist for the same language."
|
||||
|
||||
- [John Mueller: hreflang canonical](https://johnmu.com/hreflang-canonical/)
|
||||
- [Google: Consolidate Duplicate URLs](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/consolidate-duplicate-urls)
|
||||
|
||||
### Canonical Overrides Hreflang
|
||||
|
||||
Mueller: "If your canonical is pointing somewhere else, Google will follow that and ignore your hreflang annotation." The canonical URL must be one of the URLs in the hreflang set, or all hreflang markup is ignored.
|
||||
|
||||
Google also states: "Google prefers URLs that are part of hreflang clusters for canonicalization" -- when signals align, hreflang strengthens canonical selection.
|
||||
|
||||
- [John Mueller: hreflang canonical](https://johnmu.com/hreflang-canonical/)
|
||||
- [SEJ: Hreflang Tags Are Hints](https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-reminds-that-hreflang-tags-are-hints-not-directives/546428/)
|
||||
- [Google: Consolidate Duplicate URLs](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/consolidate-duplicate-urls)
|
||||
|
||||
### Near-Duplicate Regional Variants
|
||||
|
||||
Mueller (2023 Office Hours): "If the content is completely the same, and we can't tell any difference, then for simplicity and user experience we may just show one version -- even if hreflang is present."
|
||||
|
||||
Google's duplicate detection runs BEFORE hreflang evaluation. To keep both versions indexed, you need substantive content differences beyond currency symbols.
|
||||
|
||||
- [International Web Mastery: Same-Language Duplicate Pages](https://internationalwebmastery.com/blog/how-google-handles-canonicalization-of-same-language-duplicate-near-duplicate-pages/)
|
||||
- [Google: Managing Multi-Regional Sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites)
|
||||
|
||||
### Pagination Across Locales
|
||||
|
||||
Google: "Don't use the first page of a paginated sequence as the canonical page. Instead, give each page its own canonical URL." Each paginated page in each locale gets self-referencing canonical. `rel="next/prev"` deprecated March 2019.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Pagination Best Practices](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/ecommerce/pagination-and-incremental-page-loading)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## International Sitemaps
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Each `<url>` entry includes `<xhtml:link>` alternates for every locale. Requires `xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"` namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
Split sitemaps by content type, not by locale. Splitting by locale creates maintenance problems because every locale sitemap must reference every other locale (reciprocal requirement).
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Search Central: Localized Versions](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions)
|
||||
- [Lumar: How Google Handles Hreflang](https://www.lumar.io/office-hours/hreflang/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Size Limits
|
||||
|
||||
50,000 URLs / 50MB uncompressed per sitemap. Only `<loc>` elements count toward the 50K limit. But with 20 hreflang alternates per entry, the 50MB file size limit becomes the bottleneck. Plan for 2,000-5,000 URLs per sitemap when using full hreflang.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Build and Submit a Sitemap](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/sitemaps/build-sitemap)
|
||||
- [SERoundtable: Sitemap 50,000 Limit](https://www.seroundtable.com/google-sitemap-50-000-limit-based-on-location-urls-not-alternative-urls-33843.html)
|
||||
|
||||
### Submission
|
||||
|
||||
Submit the sitemap index in Search Console AND reference it in robots.txt. Individual child sitemaps can be submitted separately for per-sitemap reporting.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Build and Submit a Sitemap](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/sitemaps/build-sitemap)
|
||||
|
||||
### Next.js Caveat
|
||||
|
||||
Next.js `alternates.languages` does NOT automatically include a self-referencing `<xhtml:link>` for the `<loc>` URL. You must explicitly include the `<loc>` URL's own language in the `languages` object.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Next.js Docs: sitemap.xml](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/metadata/sitemap)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## URL Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategies Compared
|
||||
|
||||
Google treats subdirectories and subdomains equivalently. Mueller: "From our point of view...they say subdomains and subdirectories are essentially equivalent."
|
||||
|
||||
URL parameters (`?lang=en`) are explicitly "Not recommended" per Google docs.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Managing Multi-Regional Sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites)
|
||||
|
||||
### Default Language
|
||||
|
||||
Mueller recommends: set `/` as x-default, put each language in its own prefix. Without marking `/` as x-default, "to Google it can look like '/' is a separate page from the others."
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Blog: x-default](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/05/x-default)
|
||||
- [Google Blog: Creating the Right Homepage](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2014/05/creating-right-homepage-for-your)
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Negotiation / IP Redirects
|
||||
|
||||
Google strongly advises against locale-adaptive pages. Googlebot crawls from US IPs and does not send Accept-Language headers. Separate URLs + hreflang are required.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Locale-Adaptive Pages](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/locale-adaptive-pages)
|
||||
|
||||
### Trailing Slash Consistency
|
||||
|
||||
Mueller: trailing slash is "a significant part of the URL and will change the URL if it's there or not." Pick one format for all locale paths, internal links, canonicals, hreflang, and sitemaps.
|
||||
|
||||
Mueller (2025): "Consistency is the biggest technical SEO factor."
|
||||
|
||||
- [SERoundtable: Consistency Is The Biggest Technical SEO Factor](https://www.seroundtable.com/google-consistency-seo-40427.html)
|
||||
|
||||
### Search Console Geotargeting
|
||||
|
||||
The International Targeting report is deprecated. Google now relies entirely on hreflang, content language analysis, and linking patterns. You can add subdirectory properties for per-locale reporting.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Support: International Targeting Deprecated](https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/12474899?hl=en)
|
||||
|
||||
### Framework Locale Modes
|
||||
|
||||
Use `localePrefix: 'always'` (next-intl) or equivalent. Never hide locale from URLs -- Google needs unique URLs per language. Using `'never'` mode disables alternate links entirely.
|
||||
|
||||
- [next-intl: Routing Configuration](https://next-intl.dev/docs/routing/configuration)
|
||||
- [Next.js Discussion #18419](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/18419)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Quality Across Locales
|
||||
|
||||
### Auto-Translated Content (2025 Stance)
|
||||
|
||||
Google removed longstanding guidance advising against auto-translated content in mid-2025. Current stance: "Our policies do not strictly define content that has been translated by AI as spam." The scaled content abuse policy mentions translation as a possible vector, but does not ban it.
|
||||
|
||||
Reddit scaled AI translations to 35+ languages with Google's knowledge. The key distinction is intent and quality, not the method.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Spam Policies](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-policies)
|
||||
- [Glenn Gabe: Auto-Translating Content](https://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/auto-translating-content-google-scaled-content-abuse/)
|
||||
- [SE Land: Reddit AI Translations](https://searchengineland.com/google-comments-on-reddits-use-of-ai-to-translate-its-pages-456908)
|
||||
|
||||
### Thin Locale Pages
|
||||
|
||||
Google: "Localized versions of a page are only considered duplicates if the main content of the page remains untranslated." Pages with only translated boilerplate get clustered as duplicates.
|
||||
|
||||
Do NOT use noindex for unwanted locale pages (wastes crawl budget). Do NOT canonical cross-locale (conflicts with hreflang). Best approach: don't create locale pages you can't make genuinely helpful.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Localized Versions](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/localized-versions)
|
||||
- [Google: Crawl Budget Management](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/large-site-managing-crawl-budget)
|
||||
|
||||
### Helpful Content System Impact
|
||||
|
||||
Merged into core ranking March 2024. Site-wide signal: "any content -- not just unhelpful content -- on sites determined to have relatively high amounts of unhelpful content overall is less likely to perform well in Search."
|
||||
|
||||
Low-quality translated pages can drag down the entire site. This is the strongest argument against creating locale pages that aren't genuinely helpful.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google Blog: Helpful Content Update](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2022/08/helpful-content-update)
|
||||
- [Amsive: What Changed in 2024](https://www.amsive.com/insights/seo/googles-helpful-content-update-ranking-system-what-happened-and-what-changed-in-2024/)
|
||||
|
||||
### Partial Translation
|
||||
|
||||
Google: "Translating only the boilerplate text of your pages while keeping the bulk of your content in a single language...can create a bad user experience." Google uses visible content (not lang attribute) to determine page language.
|
||||
|
||||
Translate ALL content on a page if you create a locale version. Untranslated metadata (title, description) in the wrong language reduces CTR.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Managing Multi-Regional Sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites)
|
||||
|
||||
### Crawl Budget
|
||||
|
||||
Only a concern for 1M+ pages or 10K+ pages changing daily. But alternate URLs (hreflang targets) do consume crawl budget. Broken hreflang links waste budget AND invalidate signals.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Crawl Budget Management](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/large-site-managing-crawl-budget)
|
||||
- [Google Blog: Crawl Budget](https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2017/01/what-crawl-budget-means-for-googlebot)
|
||||
|
||||
### Locale-Specific Signals
|
||||
|
||||
Google identifies audience via: "local addresses and phone numbers on the pages, the use of local language and currency, links from other local sites, or signals from your Business Profile."
|
||||
|
||||
- [Google: Managing Multi-Regional Sites](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/specialty/international/managing-multi-regional-sites)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user